Methylene Chloride DCM HPLC Grade

Supplied in bulk, 25 kg drums and 200 L steel drums. We provide import‑export service for global customers. Please contact us for latest price.

Methylene Chloride DCM HPLC Grade is a high-purity dichloromethane solvent supplied in manufacturer-specific catalogue configurations, commonly as 1 L, 2.5 L, and 4 L borosilicate glass bottles with 24 mm or 33 mm fluoropolymer-lined caps, and as 200 L epoxy-phenolic-lined steel drums. The product is defined by CAS registry number 75-09-2, molecular formula CH₂Cl₂, relative molecular mass 84.93 g/mol, boiling point 39.6 °C at 101.3 kPa, density 1.325 g/mL at 20 °C, vapor pressure 47 kPa at 20 °C, and refractive index 1.4242 at 20 °C. HPLC-grade material is distinguished from technical and ACS reagent grades by simultaneous control of water, non-volatile residue, acidity, stabilizer identity, and low-wavelength UV absorbance. Typical uses include mobile-phase modifier in normal-phase and size-exclusion chromatography, liquid-liquid extraction solvent for semivolatile organic residues, and diluent for polymers that require chlorinated-solvent solubility. The material is not a single universal industry model; product codes are supplier-specific and should be matched to the certificate of analysis for the intended detector and extraction method.

No universal model designation exists across suppliers; instead, the product is identified by catalogue number, package size, and stabilizer type. Labels may specify “DCM HPLC Grade stabilized with amylene” or “DCM HPLC Grade stabilized with cyclohexane,” and this stabilizer distinction is operationally significant for trace method blank control. For assay and water determinations, the product is released by lot after analysis of representative drum or bottle samples. A typical certificate of analysis lists assay by gas chromatography, water by coulometric Karl Fischer titration, non-volatile residue by gravimetry, and UV absorbance in a 1 cm quartz cell against water. Package selection depends on laboratory throughput: amber glass bottles reduce photolytic degradation of stabilizer, while 200 L drums require stainless steel or PTFE transfer lines because DCM attacks polycarbonate, acrylic, and many elastomeric seals.

Physical and Chromatographic Specification Envelope

Dichloromethane HPLC grade is controlled through a specification envelope rather than a single property. The most critical parameters for UV/Vis detection are absorbance at defined wavelengths, water content, and non-volatile residue. Water content above 0.02% can deactivate silica in normal-phase chromatography and cause retention drift on unbonded silica columns; residue after evaporation above 0.0005% can produce ghost peaks and suppress ionization in LC-MS extracts. The low-wavelength UV cutoff of DCM is approximately 233 nm, which confines sensitive detection to wavelengths above 240 nm unless a low-volume flow cell and reference wavelength correction are used. Table 1 lists representative release limits for a standard HPLC-grade product; supplier-specific ranges may be tighter.

The assay value is typically determined by internal normalization and does not distinguish co-eluting chlorinated homologues unless a mass-selective detector is used. For that reason, batches intended for trace environmental work are often screened by GC-ECD or GC-MS after a 500× concentration step. The gravimetric residue limit is measured on a 100 mL aliquot evaporated in a platinum dish at 105 °C for 30 min; this value does not guarantee absence of low-volatility stabilizer components if the product is evaporated to dryness in extractive concentration. Users preparing extracts for GC-MS should verify blank chromatograms at the exact concentration factor used in the method, because stabilizer-derived artifacts can co-elute with n-alkanes below C₁₀.

Why Does Low UV Absorbance Constrain Method Detection Limits?

A photodiode array detector with a 10 mm flow cell and 4 nm slit width will show background absorbance from DCM that rises sharply below 240 nm. In gradient methods where DCM increases from 2% to 60% over 20 min, the baseline shift can exceed 0.2 AU at 230 nm unless the product has tight absorbance specifications. HPLC-grade DCM is therefore controlled at 240 nm, 250 nm, and 275 nm rather than at a single wavelength. For a typical 250 mm × 4.6 mm C₁₈ column packed with fully porous 5 µm silica, a 1.0 mL/min mobile phase containing 10% DCM produced baseline noise below 1 × 10^-4 AU at 254 nm when high-purity grade was used, but published data for this specific configuration is limited; method-specific blank runs are required. Use of DCM below 233 nm is generally unsuitable because the solvent itself absorbs strongly, reducing detector linearity and limiting the signal-to-noise ratio for low-level impurities.

In reversed-phase gradient methods, DCM is introduced as a strong solvent to flush highly retained neutral lipids, polymer additives, and carotenoids from C₁₈ or C₈ columns. In US EPA Method 3510C, DCM is used as the extraction solvent for semivolatile organic compounds from aqueous samples; HPLC-grade material with low residue and low UV background reduces artifact formation following Kuderna-Danish or nitrogen blowdown concentration. For size-exclusion chromatography of polycarbonate and polystyrene resins, DCM is preferred over tetrahydrofuran when samples are thermally sensitive or when THF peroxides interfere with UV detection. A 300 mm × 7.8 mm Styragel HR column can be operated with DCM at 1.0 mL/min; polymer retention times may shift if water ingress occurs, so the solvent should be kept under nitrogen after opening. The product is also used to reconstitute dried extracts prior to LC-MS/MS analysis; however, direct infusion of DCM into electrospray sources is not recommended because chloride adduct formation and ion suppression vary with source temperature and nebulizer gas flow.

When Stabilizer Composition Becomes the Critical Batch Variable

Dichloromethane is inherently unstable under heat, light, and oxygen, forming trace hydrogen chloride and phosgene-related decomposition products. To prevent acid-catalyzed degradation and container corrosion, manufacturers add low levels of stabilizers. HPLC-grade DCM is typically amylene-stabilized or cyclohexane-stabilized; some products contain ethanol. The stabilizer is not inert in chromatographic methods. Amylene (2-methyl-2-butene) elutes in the nonpolar region and can co-elute with volatile hydrocarbons when extracts are concentrated; it also absorbs weakly in the far-UV range. Ethanol-stabilized DCM can increase polar baseline disturbances in normal-phase silica systems and can compete with analytes for active silanol sites. Cyclohexane-stabilized material can produce a solvent impurity at retention index near 600 on nonpolar GC columns, which may interfere with C₆ hydrocarbon analysis. For LC-UV work at 254 nm, stabilizer absorbance is generally negligible, but for low-wavelength detection at 215 nm to 230 nm, the stabilizer type must be specified because absorbance differences between amylene-stabilized and ethanol-stabilized lots can exceed 0.05 AU in a 1 cm cell. Published data for this specific configuration is limited; certificate-of-analysis stabilizer concentration and blank injection are required for method transfer.

Storage in original amber glass under nitrogen or dry air at 15 °C to 25 °C is required; prolonged storage above 30 °C accelerates stabilizer depletion and acid formation. Containers must be resealed immediately after use because atmospheric moisture can raise water content above 0.02% and promote corrosion of steel transfer lines. DCM is incompatible with aluminum powders, zinc dust, strong bases, and reactive alkali metals; it attacks polycarbonate, acrylic, and many fluoropolymer elastomers. The product is classified as hazardous under CLP: H315, H319, H336, H351. The OSHA 8-hour time-weighted average permissible exposure limit is 25 ppm, and the 15-minute short-term exposure limit is 125 ppm. Under EU REACH Annex XVII entry 59, DCM may not be used in consumer paint strippers; industrial applications require closed-loop ventilation and exposure monitoring according to national workplace regulations. Residual solvent content in pharmaceutical materials is evaluated under ICH Q3C Class 2, with a permitted daily exposure of 6.0 mg/day and a concentration limit of 600 ppm in drug products; the solvent itself is not a pharmaceutical-grade excipient.

Comparative Grading Matrix Against Reagent and Technical Solvents

The practical difference between HPLC-grade DCM and lower grades is not a single chemical property but the analytical blank after concentration. ACS reagent grade can be suitable for extraction when the final chromatographic step is highly selective, but its residue and UV absorbance may not be controlled to the same limits. Technical-grade material is used in vapor degreasing and polymer processing where purity is irrelevant and stabilizer packages are optimized for metal protection, not detector cleanliness. GC-grade DCM may have lower water and excellent ECD blank performance, but may not be tested for UV absorbance at 240 nm to 275 nm. Table 2 provides a representative grading comparison.

The distinction between HPLC grade and GC grade is frequently misunderstood. GC-grade DCM may be manufactured with lower stabilizer levels and may be packaged to reduce phthalate contamination, but unless UV absorbance is specified on the certificate of analysis, it cannot be assumed suitable for low-wavelength HPLC detection. Conversely, HPLC-grade DCM may contain a stabilizer that interferes with electron capture detection if not removed. For methods involving both techniques, a single lot qualified by blank concentration and headspace GC-MS is used across both platforms; otherwise, separate lots are maintained with different acceptance criteria. The certificate of analysis is therefore not an interchange certificate. Batch release should include retained samples and long-term stability data for water and acidity because container seals can fail over time, particularly in 2.5 L and 4 L packages that are opened repeatedly.

For LC-MS applications, HPLC-grade DCM may require additional verification because the HPLC grade does not universally control metal cations or plasticizer residues that ionize in electrospray. Some suppliers offer LC-MS-grade DCM with certified sodium and potassium concentrations below 0.1 mg/kg and total phthalate concentrations below 0.05 mg/kg; these limits are not part of a standard HPLC-grade specification. When such data are absent, a blank evaporation of 100 mL and reconstitution in 1.0 mL methanol is used to detect contaminant ion signals before sample introduction. In method transfer, a new lot of DCM HPLC grade is qualified by comparing blank chromatograms, retention times of a standard probe mixture, and detector noise against the previous lot on the same instrument. Failure modes observed in production-scale chromatography include phase splitting in aqueous DCM mixtures, baseline spikes from stabilizer depletion, and retention-time drift caused by water absorption in high-humidity laboratories. For instruments fitted with peristaltic pump lines, the elastomer must be verified for DCM compatibility because swelling can release plasticizer artifacts into the mobile phase.